Showing posts with label american cinema. Show all posts
Showing posts with label american cinema. Show all posts

June 14, 2009

Brief Impressions: The Taking of Pelham 1 2 3 (Scott, 2009)


Days before the release of Tony Scott's The Taking of Pelham 1 2 3, I came across a handful of early reviews touting this third adaptation of John Godey's 1973 crime novel as being the best and most satisfying of the lot. As a great admirer of Joseph Sargent's 1974 adaptation, an underrated and under seen gem (and seminal "New York City" film), I struggled to understand how this could be possible, but nevertheless, my interest was piqued.

Having seen Scott's film, my immediate reaction is this: Anyone who champions this film as superior to Sargent's is immediately calling into question their cinematic taste. That is not to say this latest rendition of Pelham is a terrible film. Though Scott once again gives in to his typical directorial excess where a workmanlike, direct style would be more appropriate (see Sargent's film), he benefits from committed performances and a script from Brian Helgeland that adds some interesting depth to the main characters. But Scott's film isn't the portrait of a city and its inhabitants that Sargent's film was, and grit and personality are sacrificed at the altar of empty style. The end result: A solid, though unremarkable, surface-level thriller. And the last time I checked, the gap between unremarkable and classic was a fairly wide one.

February 21, 2008

The Molly Maguires (Ritt, 1970)


Ritt's bleak portrait of working class immigrants chasing liberty and the American dream belongs to the golden age of American cinema that began with Bonnie & Clyde, and is far more intelligent and artfully crafted than it is given credit for. James Wong Howe's incredible scope photography of the coal mines and Tambi Larsen & Darrell Silvera's Oscar nominated art direction lend the film a sooty authenticity, and the wordless nearly 15-minute long opening sequence immediately calls to mind P.T. Anderson's There Will Be Blood. As in his best work, Ritt doesn't allow his fondness for tackling social problems to overpower the narrative. A film in serious need of critical reappraisal. IMDb listing.

February 20, 2008

Killer's Kiss (Kubrick, 1955)


Stanley Kubrick's lean B noir, only his second feature length film, provides a revealing glimpse of his emerging personal style. And though Killer's Kiss is a relatively simple exercise, running a trim 67 minutes, it is fascinating how Kubrick chooses to tell this pulpy story of l'amour fou with images rather than dialogue. The final chase sequence is a thing of beauty.

January 11, 2008

Juno (Reitman, 2007)


This year's Little Miss Sunshine. That seems to be the label of choice for all of the award season pundits when discussing Juno. And though the comparisons are apt to a certain degree (this sort of hip, colorful, American indie filmmaking has become a genre unto itself) Juno does a remarkable job of toeing the line. On occasion, it comes close, but director Jason Reitman and writer Diablo Cody never quite allow the film to implode into the realm of cloying quirkiness. Juno's cheekiness may be annoying at times, but it feels quite true to her emotional and physical maturity. Ellen Page is sure to be the beneficiary of much praise, but the performance to savor is J.K. Simmons, who imbues his role as Juno's father with humor and a wonderfully confused but unwavering love. Certainly not the year's best, but funnier, if quite a bit lighter, than last year's indie sensation.

January 9, 2008

Charlie Wilson's War (Nichols, 2007)


Charlie Wilson's War is a product that looks like an Oscar contender, smells like and Oscar contender, and has the pedigree of an Oscar contender, but once finally revealed, is nothing more than nicely polished fluff. Let me clarify that in no way do I abhor Mike Nichols' film. It's just that any talk of this film as one of the year's best is quite baffling to me. There is certainly much to enjoy. Yet, there is something about Nichols' film, its inherent simplicity, the pandering nature of the entire exercise, that I can't quite get past.

This is pop history, nothing more, nothing less. A simplistic exploration of a complex period of recent US history that nevertheless feels strangely pretend. Too refined to be considered proper farce, the film also lacks the subversiveness and vitriolic energy that the best satire requires. And Nichols' filmmaking, while polished and professional, feels strangely hollow. Gone is his feel for the contours of human behavior, and the vitality, that marked much of his early work. So while Sorkin's script crackles and pops in all the right places (done exceptional service by Hoffman's perfectly mannered and hilarious turn as CIA man Gust Avrakotos), it does so in the service of nothing particularly meaningful. Unless of course, you are the type who would confuse lazy, obvious, finger-pointing, for something clever and meaningful.

In the end, when the entire aftermath of Wilson's clandestine campaign is reduced to a single minutes long scene in a conference room (and capped by a punchline quote), it becomes clear what Nichols' real intentions are. Charlie Wilson's War is a breezy comedy that one can enjoy for a brisk 97 minutes and forget nearly as quickly. For truly inspired satire, check out Nichols' Catch-22 instead.

October 31, 2007

Day Of The Dead (Romero, 1985)


"The darkest day of horror the world has ever known."

I was simply unprepared for just how good Day of the Dead is. It was the only "Dead" film I hadn't seen before, and its reputation lagged far behind that of Night of the Living Dead and Dawn of the Dead, so i had always written it off as the least of Romero's "Dead" trilogy. But watching it immediately following a repeat viewing of Dawn... If this film isn't the equal of those first two masterpieces, it isn't that far behind. Since its disastrous release in 1985, Day of the Dead has been picking up steam, and a strong critical following. Let me assure you, this isn't simply wishful revisionism, it is happening for a reason.

Film Rating: A-
Scare Factor: C+

View Date: 10/30
Shocktober Horror Film Count: #30

Dawn Of The Dead (Romero, 1978)


"When there's no more room in HELL, the dead will walk the EARTH."

Dawn of the Dead, the second, and certainly most popular installment in Romero's "Dead" series is another masterpiece of horror, every bit the equal of Night of the Living Dead. There's something about the aesthetics of the film, the late 70's style evidenced in the Monroeville mall's cavernous interior (both vast and claustrophobic at the same time), that I really love. And amidst the horror and sadness, there is a playful quality to Romero's film that is absent in every other "Dead" film. Another enduring classic.

Film Rating: A+
Scare Factor: C

View Date: 10/30
Shocktober Horror Film Count: #29

October 28, 2007

Society (Yuzna, 1989)


"It is a matter of good breeding. Really."

Certainly not the cult sleeper many seem to think it is, Society fails to live up to the potential of it's premise (an examination of the dark underbelly of upper class Beverly Hills society) simply because director Brian Yuzna and company think their film is far more clever than it actually is. The satire isn't quite as scathing, intelligent, or witty as it could have been, and the infamous special effects, while certainly still repugnant, are quite obvious. Still, it is an interesting and disturbing film, though it isn't hard to see why it has remained an "unknown" film in the genre.

Film Rating: C+
Scare Factor: C

View Date: 10/27
Shocktober Horror Film Count: #24

October 27, 2007

Rosemary's Baby (Polanski, 1968)


"Pray for Rosemary's Baby."

What can be said about Rosemary's Baby that hasn't already been said? Not much really. Everything you've heard is true. Polanski's film is one of the few perfect horror films ever made.

Film Rating: A+
Scare Factor: B

View Date: 10/26
Shocktober Horror Film Count: #23

Season Of The Witch (Romero, 1972)


"Caviar in the kitchen, nothing in the bedroom."

Released under a host of titles - Hungry Wives, Jack's Wife (Romero's preferred title), and finally Season of the Witch - Romero's "lost" film, made in between Night of the Living Dead and The Crazies, is a stunner. More sociological examination than pure horror film, it is both a fascinating time capsule and an interesting comment on marital relations and the suburban female psyche.

Film Rating: B+/B
Scare Factor: C-

View Date: 10/26
Shocktober Horror Film Count: #22

The Legend Of Boggy Creek (Pierce, 1972)


"A true story."

thoughts coming soon...

Film Rating: C
Scare Factor: D

View Date: 10/25
Shocktober Horror Film Count: #20

October 24, 2007

Let's Scare Jessica To Death (Hancock, 1971)


"Something is after Jessica. Something very cold, very wet... and very dead..."

That John D. Hancock's Let's Scare Jessica To Death isn't more commonly known and discussed is a real shame. I can't believe a film this finely tuned has escaped the general consciousness for so long. Perhaps it's simply too refined, too subtle a creature (the film certainly belies its sensationalist title) to appeal to more than just a niche audience, but whatever the case may be, do yourself a favor and discover this film now.

Film Rating: A-/B+
Scare Factor: B-

View Date: 10/23
Shocktober Horror Film Count: #18

October 23, 2007

The Entity (Furie, 1981)


"A story so shocking, so threatening, it will frighten you beyond all imagination."

The Entity certainly lends credence to the notion that the unseen is far scarier than the seen. Though Sidney J. Furie's direction is by and large pedestrian, the film is overlong, and the rambling narrative takes some unfortunate turns, Barbara Hershey's brave performance and a truly scary central premise make up for much of the film's faults.

Film Rating: B-
Scare Factor: B

View Date: 10/22
Shocktober Horror Film Count: #17

October 22, 2007

Night Of The Living Dead (Romero, 1968)


"They keep coming back in a bloodthirsty lust for HUMAN FLESH!..."

It's important to revisit George A. Romero's Night of the Living Dead - fast approaching its 40th anniversary - every now and then, if only to be reminded of the limitless potential of the horror genre. A stunning marriage of brute, unflinching violence and potent allegory, Romero's film doesn't seem to have aged one bit. If anything, for me it is one of those films that keeps getting better with each subsequent viewing. The father of the modern zombie film for sure, but also a father of astute, socially conscious horror cinema.

Film Rating: A+
Scare Factor: C

View Date: 10/19
Shocktober Horror Film Count: #14

October 19, 2007

April Fool's Day (Walton, 1986)


"Guess who's going to be the life of the party?"

A loose and playful take on Agatha Christie's And Then There Were None (a.k.a. Ten Little Indians), Fred Walton's April Fool's Day is quite a fun little anomaly in the slasher sub-genre. With the emphasis placed refreshingly upon mystery rather than explicit violence, this is horror that doesn't leave a sour taste in the mouth, and there is certainly a place for this type of facile, diverting entertainment amongst the genre's more exploitative offerings.

Film Rating: B-
Scare Factor: C+

View Date: 10/18
Shocktober Horror Film Count: #12

October 16, 2007

Friday The 13th (Cunningham, 1980)


"They were warned... They are doomed... And on Friday the 13th, nothing will save them."

It has spawned countless imitators and one of the longest running horror franchises of all-time, but there is no getting around the fact that Sean S. Cunningham’s influential Friday the 13th remains the least accomplished of the proto-slashers (Bob Clark's Black Christmas and John Carpenter's Halloween included). This is plain-Jane filmmaking, an obvious, workmanlike stab at entertainment first and foremost, lacking a distinct visual style and populated by stock characters and situations. It is also unpretentious, nostalgic fun, possessing a handful of genuine scares, still fantastic gore f/x, and a terrific score. In retrospect, iconic status and a killer ending can do quite a lot to cloud the memory, and though Cunningham’s film is a classic more through influence and reputation than through virtuosity, its place amongst the most beloved and perennial of horror films is more than guaranteed.

Film Rating: B-
Scare Factor: C+

View Date: 10/15
Shocktober Horror Film Count: #10

October 15, 2007

The Other (Mulligan, 1972)


"Holland, where is the baby?"

Robert Mulligan’s bucolic, sunlit chiller The Other exhibits none of the symptoms of the violent disease plaguing contemporary horror, which is to say it is a subtle, contemplative work as far removed from the “Sturm und Drang” graphic excesses of the genre as is cinematically possible. Adapted by Tom Tryon from his eponymous novel, it is an ambiguous, atypical work in a genre oft-characterized by typicality, one that unearths a horror far more affecting, far more difficult to grasp, and thus far more disturbing than anything that can be achieved with buckets of blood.

In a choice unusual for a horror film, Mulligan and cinematographer Robert Surtees bathe the film in almost constant golden light. Set on a Connecticut farm during summer, the beautiful environs seem to suggest a film with little potential to scare. Yet, one soon realizes that these sun-soaked surroundings serve as a foil for the site of the film’s horror. Mulligan locates his horror in interiors, in the places where light must strain to reach – the barn, the cellar and the well – and ultimately in a place where light cannot go – the mind. For such a bright film, The Other is interminably dark.

Film Rating: A-/A
Scare Factor: B+

View Date: 10/10
Shocktober Horror Film Count: #9

October 10, 2007

Lady In White (LaLoggia, 1988)


"The year is 1962. The place is Willowpoint Falls. Nobody talks about what happened in the school cloakroom 10 years ago. Now, in the dead of night, Frankie Scarlatti is going to find out why."

A refreshingly old fashioned ghost story, and a charming coming-of-age tale tinged with nostalgia and wonderfully told from a child's eye view. Much of the film's success must be credited to the empathy and respect LaLoggia displays towards his child actors, which in turn elicits honest, heartfelt performances, especially from Lukas Haas in the film's lead role. Blessed with an earnestness that makes it a pleasure to experience, Lady in White is a hard film to dislike.

Film Rating: B/B+
Scare Factor: C-

View Date: 10/9
Shocktober Horror Film Count: #8

October 8, 2007

Tourist Trap (Schmoeller, 1979)


“Every year young people disappear.”

As is so often the case with horror cinema, a good horror film doesn’t necessarily equate with a good film. In a phenomenon particular to the horror genre – a phenomenon ensconced in the genre’s extreme valuation of a “bottom line” – good acting, narrative coherence, and refined direction are rather dispensable qualities. In the end, a horror film’s reputation, its standing, if you will, depends on its ability to scare, its capacity to disturb the mind and set the heart racing. For this reason, it isn’t hard to comprehend why David Schmoeller’s Tourist Trap remains a fairly well regarded work (within the horror community) in spite of its numerous ineptitudes.

Tourist Trap seems a familiar film when discussed in broad terms. It depicts a group of college-age kids trapped in a strange place, terrorized by a masked man, and killed one by one. Released in 1979, sandwiched between John Carpenter’s archetypal Halloween (1978) and Sean S. Cunningham’s influential Friday the 13th (1980), it is rather enticing to lump Schmoeller’s film in with these exemplars as part of the 80’s slasher cycle. However, such comparisons remain apt only at a surface level, for although Tourist Trap’s narrative template suggests a strong relation to slasher cinema, Schmoeller has created a film that operates far outside the precise and restrictive boundaries of that much loved sub-genre.

In place of the brazen sexuality, gruesome violence, and formulaic predictability that have come to define the slasher film, an unmistakable surfeit of bizarreness marks every inch of Tourist Trap. Everything from Pino Donaggio’s eclectic, effectively creepy score (a strange amalgamation of instruments and dissonant vocal fragments), to Chuck Connors’s unhinged performance (an audacious attempt at late-stage career redefinition), to the disturbingly rigid (and later on not so rigid) mannequins, to Schmoeller’s willful, baffling commingling of incongruous horror references (Carrie, The Texas Chain Saw Massacre, House of Wax), suggests Schmoeller’s attempt to root audience fear in the film’s connective tissue, its eerie atmosphere, rather than in increasingly extravagant murder set pieces.

Unsurprisingly, it is in these peculiarities that the film’s true value is located. Schmoeller generates fear with his environment, through an unsettling collage of disembodied sounds and grotesque facades that stay with you long after the film ends. Importance is placed upon the process by which we arrive at the film’s relatively few deaths, rather than upon the deaths themselves, forcing us to pay attention to the pervasive, distressing details of the environment. Collectively they generate an eerie, macabre ambiance so thick and unyielding that Tourist Trap remains frightening and at times even threatening despite the absence of any real gore and the low body count. Partially obscured by the heavy fog of terror are the elements that conspire to sink the film, namely the amateurish acting (save, of course, for Connors) and the many ridiculous logical inconsistencies. And though the film is a crude, flawed, easily ridiculed mechanism with all the subtlety of a jackhammer, it is certainly unique and strangely effective. Not to mention it’s got a killer final shot.

Film Rating: C+/B-
Scare Factor: B

View Date: 10/7
Shocktober Horror Film Count: #7

October 5, 2007

Carrie (De Palma, 1976)


"If only they knew she had the power."

Brian De Palma’s screen adaptation of Stephen King’s novel Carrie is a rare film that looses none of its considerable poignancy or visceral power from viewing to viewing and thus, is probably as effective a film as it was 31 years ago. A stunningly orchestrated, stylistically audacious study of female adolescence, teenage insecurity, and religious hysteria, this is without a doubt one of the best horror films ever made. Simply transcendent.

Film Rating: A+
Scare Factor: A-

View Date: 10/5
Shocktober Horror Film Count: #6